爱游戏体育

LSAT Validity

Summary of 2017, 2018, and 2019 LSAT Correlation Study Results

Since the inception of the Law School Admission Test (LSAT), the Law School Admission Council (爱游戏体育) has sought to evaluate and ensure its validity for use in the law school admission process. As predictive validity is an important component in the overall evaluation of test validity, 爱游戏体育 has carried out predictive validity studies, also called LSAT Correlation Studies, since the test was first administered. The LSAT Correlation Studies evaluate the effectiveness of LSAT scores, undergraduate grade point average (UGPA), and the combination of LSAT scores and UGPA for predicting a student鈥檚 first-year average (FYA) in law school. This report provides summaries of the combined results for the law schools participating in the  2017, 2018 and 2019  LSAT Correlation Studies. These results serve to document and support the strong predictive validity of LSAT scores for use in the law school admission process. These findings are consistent with all prior reports in showing that LSAT scores are a better predictor of law school performance compared to UGPAs, and that the combination of LSAT scores and UGPA continues to be the best predictor of FYA.

Additional reports in this collection

LSAT Validity and ABA Standard 503

A Foundation of Validity

Beginning with the very first notion of a standardized test for admission to law school, validity was a primary focus. In his May 17, 1945 letter to the College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) suggesting the development of such a test, Frank H. Bowles, Director of Admissions at Columbia University, stated the seven criteria listed below.