Skills Analysis Study:
LSAT Task Analysis
Type of Task | Analytical Reasoning | Logical Reasoning | Reading Comp. | Persuasive Writing |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Reading critically | ![]() | ![]() | ||
2. Applying a statute to new facts | ![]() | ![]() | ||
3. Identifying the statute operating in a case | ![]() | ![]() | ||
4. Identifying the key facts in a case | ![]() | ![]() | ||
5. Inductive reasoning | ![]() | ![]() | ||
6. Reading class materials | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
7. Arguing logically and persuasively in writing | ![]() | |||
8. Organizing evidence into argument | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |
9. Deductive reasoning | ![]() | ![]() | ||
10. Writing with good organizational structure | ![]() | |||
11. Writing concisely and clearly | ![]() | |||
12. Interpreting statutes in relation to a case | ![]() | ![]() | ||
13. Identifying the rule of law | ![]() | ![]() | ||
14. Allocating available time to tasks based on priorities | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
15. Identifying the key points in lectures and class discussions | ![]() | ![]() |
For More Insights...
Our blog post, 鈥淜ey Skills Needed for Law School, and How They Continue to Shape the LSAT鈥� highlights findings of this study that reveal the increasing importance of critical thinking skills for students鈥� success in law school. This research is part of 爱游戏体育鈥檚 ongoing efforts to continually evaluate and improve the LSAT to ensure it remains the best indicator of prospective students鈥� success in law school. Additionally, 爱游戏体育 applies feedback from the Skills Analysis Study to guide the development of additional assessment tools for legal education.